首页> 外文OA文献 >Investigating the Construct Validity of a Concordance-based Cloze Test: A Mixed-methods Study
【2h】

Investigating the Construct Validity of a Concordance-based Cloze Test: A Mixed-methods Study

机译:调查基于一致性的完形填空测试的构造有效性:混合方法研究

摘要

This study has two primary goals. The first is to develop a concordance-based cloze test (henceforth ConCloze), the process of which can be divided into seven stages, ConCloze 1–7. The second goal is to investigate the validity of score interpretations, which can be categorized into five aspects according to Messick’s (1995) model of construct validity: content, substantive, structural, generalizability, and external. By validity, Messick (1989: 13) referred to an integrated judgment of adequacy and appropriateness of construct-related inferences based on, e.g., item responses, observations. The sampling methods are convenience and snowball samplings, seeking non-native English speakers of mixed backgrounds in first language, who are studying in or have graduated from higher education. The analytical measures include reliability analysis, verbalization analysis, usability testing, correlation analysis, content analysis, regression analysis, Rasch modeling, sample analysis, and thematic analysis.\udThe construct domain is found to be very likely composite: at least lexical-semantic knowledge, knowledge of synonymy, knowledge of collocation, knowledge of grammatical structure, world knowledge, knowledge of word association, knowledge of semantic prosody, and knowledge of individual and compositional lexical-semantic content are tested. The test purpose is initially set to be a proficiency test on professional and academic English grammatical and vocabulary use, which is eventually refined in light of empirical findings in the investigation into a proficiency test on academic English vocabulary use, with the primary domains of knowledge of lexical-semantics and knowledge of word association. The subdomains involved become knowledge of core components in word meaning, knowledge of individual and compositional lexical-semantic content, knowledge of collocation, and knowledge of semantic prosody, with world knowledge, synonymy knowledge, and knowledge of grammatical structure functioning as construct-peripheral. Judged by the adequacy and appropriateness of response and score interpretations, an integrated evaluation is that the construct inferences for the ConCloze item type have validity.
机译:这项研究有两个主要目标。首先是开发基于一致性的完形填空测试(此后称为ConCloze),其过程可以分为七个阶段,即ConCloze 1-7。第二个目标是研究分数解释的有效性,根据梅西克(Messick,1995)的结构有效性模型,可以将分数分为五个方面:内容,实质,结构,可概括性和外部性。 Messick(1989:13)的有效性是指基于项目反应,观察等对构造相关推论的充分性和适当性的综合判断。抽样方法是便利和滚雪球抽样,寻找正在学习或毕业于高等教育的非母语英语母语的人。分析措施包括可靠性分析,语言表达分析,可用性测试,相关性分析,内容分析,回归分析,Rasch建模,样本分析和主题分析。\ ud构造域很可能是复合的:至少是词义知识测试了同义知识,并置知识,语法结构知识,世界知识,词联想知识,语义韵律知识以及个体和组成词汇语义内容的知识。最初的测试目的是针对专业和学术英语的语法和词汇使用能力进行测试,最终根据对英语知识的主要领域调查学术英语词汇使用能力的调查中的经验发现进行精炼。词汇语义学和单词联想知识。涉及的子域变成了单词含义的核心组成部分的知识,个体和组成的词汇语义内容的知识,搭配的知识以及语义韵律的知识,而世界知识,同义词知识和语法结构知识则充当构造外围知识。根据回答和分数解释的充分性和适当性判断,综合评估是ConCloze项目类型的构造推断具有有效性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kongsuwannakul, Kunlaphak;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号